Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110503
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 05:56
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 188 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 347 48% 355 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 2426) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 146 Parallax 126 114% 137 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 130 Splatting 105 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FM-25S3-120GBP3 120GB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: GS504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 70 81 84 71 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 125 Write 108 Mixed 116 SusWrite 76.7 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 22.7 83% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 91 DQ Mixed 27.3 30% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 59%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 293GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 73 79 81 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 75.3 Write 68.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 78.2 48% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 61%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB 2,211 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 165GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 56 56 57 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 55.3 Write 60.5 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 56.4 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	69x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GBSamsungBench 33%, 184 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16