User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF78
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 05:17
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 109
51% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 216
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 31.4
28% 30.3 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 31.7
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 189 196 150 98 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 244
Write 205
Mixed 218
SusWrite 146
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 42.6
141% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 51.2
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 65.2
51% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 133 133 130 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 131
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 75%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB
384GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 18.8
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 24.3
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 19%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 18.4
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 12.9
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.2
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback