User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	DIEBOLD Canyon
Motherboard	Intel DQ77MK
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 03:11
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470S 14,631 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 178 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 351 45% 343 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% PNY(196E 0593) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 4 0% 4.79 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 6.7 5% 6.34 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 53 61 39 69 79 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 87.5 Write 72 Mixed 58 SusWrite 56.8 51% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 51%
WD My Book 1110 499GB 743 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 138GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 37 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 37.8 45% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 20%
HP Photosmart 7520 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 17GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 6.2 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 9.6 11% 8.75 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 66% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 25GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 3.3 15 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 15.2 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 13.9 24% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.1 129% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)