Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 105
52% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 285
30% 237 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.1
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 17
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 298 290 293 293 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 320
Write 292
Mixed 278
SusWrite 299
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 17.4
97% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 23.7
29% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 123 151 148 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 147
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 144
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 96%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 537GB
500GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.7 7.2 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.37% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 8.3
7% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback