Medion Erazer X4703 D/C465

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMedion Erazer X4703 D/C465  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$334
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
1-Core 134
2-Core 262
94% 198 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 606
68% 522 Pts
64-Core 644
43% 644 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
Elitegroup(1019 1040) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 388
Reflection 373
Parallax 385
100% 382 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 377
Splatting 242
94% 285 fps
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 113%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT256G 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 41 9.7 5.9 12 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 434
Write 153
Mixed 11
SusWrite 16.5
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
548GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 157 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 156
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 169
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$27
166GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 95 95 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 57
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 94.1
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
30GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Read 21
Write 10
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.6
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.5
100% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 105%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Erazer X4703 D/C465 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Medion Erazer X4703 D/C465

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $862
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback