Medion Erazer X4703 D/C465

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion Erazer X4703 D/C465 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170210
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 139 2-Core 270 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 630 66% 532 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Elitegroup(1019 1040) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 144 Parallax 120 105% 131 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 126 Splatting 105 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT256G 256GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 41 9.7 5.9 12 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 434 Write 153 Mixed 11 SusWrite 16.5 33% 154 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 548GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 157 173 173 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 156 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 169 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 107%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 166GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 95 95 93 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 57 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 94.1 54% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 30GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Read 21 Write 10 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.6 12% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 2.5 100% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 22.6 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 22.8 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X4703 D/C465 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

System: Medion Erazer X4703 D/C465

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x

SSD
SD8SBAT256G 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 61 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16