MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 15:59
Run Duration	410 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 76.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 200 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 715 72% 584 Pts	64-Core 2,520 156% 2,520 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.6% Very good	Lighting 76.7 Reflection 85.9 Parallax 174 62% 112 fps	MRender 90.6 Gravity 130 Splatting 131 98% 117 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 841 844 845 844 844 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,943 Write 2,170 Mixed 1713 SusWrite 904 378% 1,682 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 68.1 234% 86 MB/s	DQ Read 965 DQ Write 708 DQ Mixed 899 655% 857 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 284%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 12GB free Firmware: CS900612 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 313 Write 267 Mixed 241 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 31.8 139% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 161 139% 201 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 238GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 472 473 472 472 473 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 473 Mixed 453 SusWrite 472 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 43.1 141% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 348 260% 346 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 109%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 238GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 472 472 472 472 472 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 471 Mixed 456 SusWrite 472 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 43.2 142% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 350 261% 346 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 109%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 233GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 309 309 309 308 308 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 2,523 Write 1,469 Mixed 1,051 SusWrite 483 305% 1,382 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 81.7 283% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 966 DQ Write 1,020 DQ Mixed 990 746% 992 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 233GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1340 307 308 308 308 308 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2528 Write 1,384 Mixed 1,021 SusWrite 480 298% 1,353 MB/s	4K Read 63.3 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 85.8 295% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 1,020 DQ Mixed 995 749% 998 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 233GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 305 304 304 304 304 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,543 Write 1,397 Mixed 949 SusWrite 476 244% 1,091 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 80.4 277% 99.8 MB/s	DQ Read 965 DQ Write 1,024 DQ Mixed 988 745% 993 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 280%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	MC Read 68.3 MC Write 70.7 MC Mixed 62.8 192% 67.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 43.3 SC Mixed 25.9 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	32x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	31x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,275Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16