User System

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade
Motherboard	Razer Razer CH20
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190108
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 07:47
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 239 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 427 52% 398 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6294 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.13% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 7.53 6% 8.78 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 6.77 Splatting 14.9 10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.13% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 1046 599 608 610 608 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 799 Write 802 Mixed 720 SusWrite 773 174% 774 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 67.2 178% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 769 DQ Mixed 860 649% 875 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 296%
Jmicron Generic 512GB 619 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 394GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 302 296 292 281 282 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 289 Write 274 Mixed 209 SusWrite 291 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 7.6 34% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 88.2 DQ Write 88.2 DQ Mixed 55.8 51% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 22.2 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 25.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)