Positivo U3100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo U3100  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T23-G
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 18:11
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 148
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 256
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 3.62
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 8.96
5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 55 76 103 96 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 76
Write 95.5
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 85.3
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE400SO51208-2400AH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback