Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7200-$80 2,351 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 22 2-Core 45.3 32% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 45.5 8-Core 45.6 6% 45.5 Pts	64-Core 44.9 3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 3 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1584 2363) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.371.0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.03 2% 1.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 74 74 74 74 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 74.4 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 72.8 13% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 19.3 64% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.5 DQ Write 27.8 DQ Mixed 21.5 17% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16