Medionpc MS-7204

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Medionpc MS-7204 (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR MS-7204
Memory	2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060427
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '19 at 09:09
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 48 32% 45.2 Pts	4-Core 47.4 8-Core 48 6% 47.7 Pts	64-Core 47.5 3% 47.5 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 010A) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.06 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 38.5 Mixed 29.1 26% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 31%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 829GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 23 20 20 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 67.6 Write 71.2 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 22 61% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 46%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 147GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.29% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 22.1 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 16 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.29% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 800 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 99GB free, PID ce23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 23.3 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 15.9 29% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 19%
QPXT U3 250GB 48GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 27 22 22 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.5% Very poor	Read 59.1 Write 57.3 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 24.8 59% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.83 MB/s

Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 59GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 13 13 12 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 73.4 Write 64.2 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 13.1 69% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 4 267% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 47%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 147GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 65.4 Write 60.7 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 18.4 53% 42.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7204 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Medionpc MS-7204

CPU
Pentium D 3.00GHzIntel $98Bench 30%, 4,281 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples	1x
GeForce 6610 XLNvidiaBench 0%, 24 samples	1x

RAM
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	1x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medionpc MS-7204

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medionpc MS-7204

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)