Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 00:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 314
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 15.7
12% 14.3 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 20.3
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 75 76 74 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 421
Write 282
Mixed 341
SusWrite 99.6
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 34.4
141% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 195
146% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 85%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
30GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 46.3
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 47.1
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
399GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 135 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 116
Write 128
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 135
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 109%
Kingston DT 101 G2 16GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.9 10 8.7 9.9 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.8
Write 9.3
SusWrite 11.4
15% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W641GU42J7240NB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $423
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback