Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180514
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 15:13
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 256
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 704
75% 597 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 145
Parallax 125
109% 135 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 130
Splatting 104
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 181 174 158 143 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 314
Mixed 181
SusWrite 162
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 38.1
158% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 238
200% 293 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 101%
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
107GB free
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 227 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 421
Write 361
Mixed 309
SusWrite 181
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 16.6
95% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 28.7
73% 150 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 66%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
192GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 51 50 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 48.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 50.8
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 32%
WD WD2500AAJB-00J3A0 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 2.8 3.2 3.2 2.7 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 3.7
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 3.3
3% 3.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 45%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 107 112 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 73
Write 122
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 112
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
169% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 64%
Freecom DATABAR 32GB
25GB free, PID fcf6
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 20 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 25
Write 21.7
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 21.7
29% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.7
166% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 31
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback