PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z87 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130703 |
Uptime | 6.6 Days |
Run Date | Feb 13 '19 at 15:03 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 84A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 65 67 65 63 65 MB/s
|
68.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 148 152 153 152 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 86x |
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 39x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 30x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 26x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $589 |