| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170721 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 13 '19 at 12:50 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.5%
Very good
|
68% 121 Pts
|
61% 502 Pts
|
53% 853 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
|
28.2%
Poor
|
28% 30.8 fps
|
28% 34.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 58 63 31 33 27 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
38% 172 MB/s
|
47% 23 MB/s
|
38% 90 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
126GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 89 98 99 100 96 MB/s
|
70%
Good
|
71% 98.3 MB/s
|
133% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78%
Very good
|
82% 28.5 GB/s
|
64% 22.4 GB/s
|
41% 97.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 43x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 19x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $734 |