Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory30.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 11:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$350
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
SC Int 82.5
SC Float 89.5
SC Mixed 86.2
69% 86.1 Pts
QC Int 314
QC Float 361
QC Mixed 339
77% 338 Pts
MC Int 862
MC Float 964
MC Mixed 924
137% 917 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 95.3
25% 75.4 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 54.9
30% 68.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$190
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 171 167 176 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 357
Write 218
Mixed 256
SusWrite 169
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 37.8
134% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 228
182% 256 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
970GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 113 113 113 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 73
SusWrite 111
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 98%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$48
309GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 91.3
Write 88
Mixed 64
SusWrite 77.4
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 90%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
816GB free
Firmware: 06.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905625-152.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 145%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 2,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $758
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $220Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $606SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback