Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory30.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 11:20
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$335
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 167
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 646
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 924
62% 924 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 95.3
19% 75.4 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 54.9
24% 68.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$220
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 171 167 176 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 357
Write 218
Mixed 256
SusWrite 169
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 37.8
134% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 228
182% 256 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$73
970GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 113 113 113 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 73
SusWrite 111
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 97%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$55
309GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 91.3
Write 88
Mixed 64
SusWrite 77.4
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 91%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
816GB free
Firmware: 06.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 123 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 119
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 123
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905625-152.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 145%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 3,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $760
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $24Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback