Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$334
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
95% 201 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 692
72% 568 Pts
64-Core 679
46% 679 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$799
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 515
Reflection 496
Parallax 520
133% 510 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 476
Splatting 286
114% 342 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 125%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 353 284 285 285 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 454
Mixed 376
SusWrite 320
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.2
202% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 359
263% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 135%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$125
526GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 434 464 464 462 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 454
Mixed 443
SusWrite 456
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.9
199% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 360
259% 333 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2 2.1 2 2 2 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 2
4% 3.47 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$189
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
66.4% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 19.6
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.8
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 121%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 4,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,608
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $202AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $329Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback