Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Memory 41.8 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 45.8 24% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 44.3 8-Core 46.3 6% 45.3 Pts	64-Core 45.4 3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
As201 240GB 240GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0423A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 11 89 22 89 MB/s Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 214 Write 129 Mixed 169 SusWrite 94.1 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 13.7 66% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 91.7 DQ Write 99.4 DQ Mixed 24.7 38% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-427.A00LF 1x8GB 350 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,495x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,737x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	377x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16