Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '19 at 20:47
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 45.3 33% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 81.5 8-Core 139 13% 110 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Palit(1569 1184) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 37.2 Parallax 48.4 31% 41.4 fps	MRender 52.8 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 35.7 36% 45.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z320 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 65 40 71 67 63 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 196 Write 95 Mixed 172 SusWrite 60.4 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 7 50% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 80.9 DQ Mixed 0.1 36% 90 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 35GB free Firmware: MS1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 160 155 169 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 172 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 162 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 50GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 59 57 59 59 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 57 Write 57 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 57.7 39% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3500841AS 500GB 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 5GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 37 42 41 39 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 53 Write 19 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 40 28% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 54 51 60 58 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 60.8 Write 36.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 56.2 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,694 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 180GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 28.7 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 29.1 36% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 13.3 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16