Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 129 60% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 344 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 222 223 223 214 223 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.4% Above average	Read 231 Write 225 Mixed 170 SusWrite 221 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 30.7 103% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 81.1 DQ Mixed 40.4 36% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $495

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16