Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$260
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.5% Good
1-Core 112
2-Core 211
77% 162 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 593
61% 478 Pts
64-Core 599
40% 599 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$170
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 230
Reflection 195
Parallax 209
58% 211 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 217
Splatting 174
58% 182 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$110
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 179 247 208 137 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 496
Write 452
Mixed 194
SusWrite 174
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 34
123% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 129
118% 183 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$90
725GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 132 131 134 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 143
Write 138
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 131
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
308GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 127 139 140 142 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 170
Write 162
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 137
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$74
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 136 150 153 153 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 159
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 148
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 98%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
592GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 86 87 89 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 93.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 86.4
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 103%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 1TB
900GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 65 65 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 98.8
Write 90.3
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 64.1
87% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 14,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $511
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $83
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback