Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 12:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 206
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 381
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 33.3
30% 32.4 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 33.9
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 66 72 67 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 118
Write 83.8
Mixed 105
SusWrite 70
21% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 14.7
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 17.5
21% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST920217AS 20GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 17 22 12 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 24.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 17.7
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 18%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
258GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 22.6
Write 22.9
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 107
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown? CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback