PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | EVGA 132-BL-E758 (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110825 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 12 '19 at 02:14 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2712) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
|
3.84%
Terrible
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8581) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 65 70 70 66 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
685GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 67 70 70 67 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
323GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 124 137 134 137 MB/s
|
85.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
244GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 90 93 93 90 MB/s
|
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR2
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 69x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 13x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)NvidiaBench 40%, 5,438 samples | 7x |
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $399 |