Acer Aspire ES1-512

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire ES1-512 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire ES1-512
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141215
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '19 at 02:06
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 45.3 1-Core 24 2-Core 38.5 25% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 42.7 8-Core 37.2 5% 40 Pts	64-Core 39.1 2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0936) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.69% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.94 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.13 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.69% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 110 14 45 54 44 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 156 Write 93 Mixed 162 SusWrite 56.9 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 16.3 70% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 99.7 76% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 693GB free Firmware: JU000U SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 134 129 130 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 140 Write 147 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 131 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.5 217% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB 19,744 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire ES1-512 Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-512

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	281x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	99x
Celeron N2940IntelBench 33%, 3,995 samples	55x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	464x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	249x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	20x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16