Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 00:29
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 848
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.3% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 79
Parallax 68.8
65% 75.9 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 74
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,944
Write 1,125
Mixed 560
264% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.9
194% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 787
619% 863 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
77GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 294 295 290 282 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 473
Mixed 376
SusWrite 310
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.7
199% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
215GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 109
Write 94
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 105
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 179 180 182 181 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 121
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 179
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 150 64GB
44GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 14.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 18.2
21% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 13%
Integral 18701914 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.21% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 10.3
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10.5
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
72% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 28.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback