Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 00:29
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$370
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
SC Int 129
SC Float 138
SC Mixed 134
107% 133 Pts
QC Int 487
QC Float 533
QC Mixed 520
116% 513 Pts
MC Int 924
MC Float 1,101
MC Mixed 1,032
152% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$230
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75% Very good
Lighting 239
Reflection 206
Parallax 220
72% 222 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 219
Splatting 170
77% 180 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,944
Write 1,125
Mixed 560
264% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.9
194% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 787
619% 863 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 241%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$104
77GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 294 295 290 282 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 473
Mixed 376
SusWrite 310
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58.7
199% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$62
215GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 109
Write 94
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 105
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 179 180 182 181 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 121
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 179
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 115%
Kingston DataTraveler 150 64GB
44GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 14.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 18.2
21% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 9%
Integral 18701914 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.21% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 10.3
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10.5
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
72% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 28.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 96%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 6,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $379Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $163Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $106
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $115Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $666SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $100SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback