Lenovo 6073A14

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 6073A14  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140108
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 50
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 46.9
28% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 54.6
8-Core 58.5
7% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 62
4% 62 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
PNY(196E 1127) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 8.5
6% 7.86 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.73
Splatting 6.61
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 70 50 70 78 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 130
Write 113
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 69.8
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback