PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 11 '19 at 18:26 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 176 187 187 185 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
224GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 96 100 101 101 MB/s
|
60.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
|
30.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,521x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 949x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 556x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 310x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 268x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 237x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $581 |