PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Asus G50VT (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK G50VT |
Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090108 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 11 '19 at 17:18 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.1
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T2535T120G 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 194 189 64 42 37 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 2x |
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $144 |