Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '19 at 16:30
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500-$173 43,089 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 96.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 259 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 660 75% 587 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37B0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 177 Parallax 187 153% 184 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 155 Splatting 113 120% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,110 Write 1,468 Mixed 691 313% 1,423 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 174 4K Mixed 58.6 243% 94 MB/s	DQ Read 1,179 DQ Write 1,068 DQ Mixed 811 694% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 381GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 482 481 487 489 486 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 487 Mixed 398 SusWrite 471 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 65.7 222% 79.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 362 259% 335 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 85 84 90 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 56.5 Write 96.3 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 86 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 4x8GB 734 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 32.7 104% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 27.7 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 51.3 78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $107

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,056x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	758x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	643x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	423x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	361x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	304x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	114x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	92x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	127x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	113x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16