Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 13:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 140
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 512
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Lighting 82.1
Reflection 80
Parallax 69
67% 77.1 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 77
61% 74.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 437 315 313 314 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,180
Write 800
Mixed 510
SusWrite 368
158% 715 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 48.6
180% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 490
367% 492 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 147%
Great: 236%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
205GB free
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 129 6.9 155 5.3 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 498
Write 423
Mixed 354
SusWrite 107
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 21
110% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 25.1
63% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
871GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 179 183 180 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 160
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 182
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
242% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 115%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback