Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 11:43
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$141
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 786
80% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,018
68% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2239 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 145
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 134
38% 122 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 129
Splatting 90.4
36% 107 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$83
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,443
Write 1,441
Mixed 1,262
378% 1,716 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 76
264% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 964
713% 940 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 273%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$40
205GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 958
Write 847
Mixed 753
190% 853 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 45.9
182% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 0.9
162% 385 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 104%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
214GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 510
Write 490
Mixed 463
109% 487 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64.4
214% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 127%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$46
554GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 99
Write 101
Mixed 51.5
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
6GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 128
Write 40.3
Mixed 59.3
82% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.8
227% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 34%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 32.8
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.3
13% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 750GB
196GB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 38
Write 3.7
Mixed 10.7
16% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 18%
WD 3200BMV External 320GB
160GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 35.5
Write 38
Mixed 24.5
41% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 34.4
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 29
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 21,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $502
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $24Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback