User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemOEGStone Q87M-E
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 11:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4790-$308
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
SC Int 107
SC Float 111
SC Mixed 116
89% 112 Pts
QC Int 395
QC Float 375
QC Mixed 399
88% 389 Pts
MC Int 546
MC Float 588
MC Mixed 584
86% 573 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.84
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.3
4% 11.6 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 6.5
4% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$105
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 489
Write 419
Mixed 389
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 58
191% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 56.8
112% 225 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 133%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $336Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $750SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $126SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback