User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.24% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardTimi TM1604
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170830
Uptime17.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 11:30
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.9% Below average
SC Int 81.8
SC Float 78.1
SC Mixed 62.8
59% 74.2 Pts
QC Int 206
QC Float 168
QC Mixed 177
42% 184 Pts
MC Int 201
MC Float 216
MC Mixed 204
31% 207 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1D72 1604) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 19.4
6% 20.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 31.1
8% 20.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 9%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$60
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1486
Write 986
Mixed 731
235% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 64.5
218% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 716
538% 722 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 233%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $336Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $750SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $126SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback