Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z97X-UD3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 20:40
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 698
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 3.16
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 37.5
36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 141 141 141 131 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 483
Mixed 353
SusWrite 173
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.5
194% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 355
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
57GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 98 94 90 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 235
Write 120
Mixed 163
SusWrite 96.9
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 34.4
142% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 80.5
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 95.2
73% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 73%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
582GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 159 159 158 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 158
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 108%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
863GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 120
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69%
Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
86GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.4 0.6 23 27 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 15.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 12.8
26% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 63%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS/MSPRO 16GB
14GB free, PID 0307
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 38
Write 36.9
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 39.1
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3
196% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback