HP Workstation z620

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Workstation z620 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	90.7 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180209
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 77 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 71.6 2-Core 181 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 652 59% 496 Pts	64-Core 1,651 102% 1,651 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.78 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 52.1 29% 42.3 fps	MRender 51.2 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 27.4 32% 40.2 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 220 224 218 217 215 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.3% Above average	Read 227 Write 215 Mixed 212 SusWrite 211 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 26 84% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 184 143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 125%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 929GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 129 134 133 130 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 137 Write 142 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 128 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 74%
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB 1,153 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 921GB free Firmware: 05.03D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 127 130 129 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 133 Mixed 79.4 SusWrite 126 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 12x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 12 of 12 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 30.4 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.8 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Workstation z620 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: HP Workstation z620

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	1x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x
Blue 1TBWD $105Bench 87%, 6,748 samples	1x

RAM
F721GR65F1600G 8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4 samples	2x
HMT42GR7BFR4A-PB 4x16GBHynixBench 61%, 21 samples	2x
M393B5270DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 104 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16