Asrock ALiveXFire-eSATA2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock ALiveXFire-eSATA2  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 20:26
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 94.6
45% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 189
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT
Asus(1043 0222) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V56OA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 56 37 41 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 53.8
Mixed 37
SusWrite 49.6
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALiveXFire-eSATA2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock ALiveXFire-eSATA2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $103
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback