| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Studio XPS 8100 |
| Motherboard | Dell Studio XPS 8100 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091209 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 09 '19 at 15:20 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.2%
Good
|
63% 100 Pts
|
36% 290 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.8%
Very good
|
64% 110 fps
|
99% 122 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 61 59 54 54 56 MB/s
|
56.9%
Above average
|
40% 180 MB/s
|
112% 37.4 MB/s
|
71% 143 MB/s
|
|
|
57.5%
Above average
|
69% 93.2 MB/s
|
194% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.7%
Below average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
64% 62.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 267x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 194x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 115x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 34x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $507 |