Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '19 at 06:36
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 94 2-Core 176 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 352 47% 353 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 58.3 48% 61.8 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 58.7 Splatting 54.3 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB 1,160 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 112 94 66 46 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 254 Write 286 Mixed 182 SusWrite 81.3 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 21.5 93% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 171 132% 182 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 81%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 46GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 217 200 195 203 205 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.3% Good	Read 227 Write 216 Mixed 190 SusWrite 207 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 36.5 121% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 114%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 592GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 162 160 159 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 159 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 161 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 449GB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 155 149 151 156 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 152 Write 129 Mixed 73 SusWrite 153 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 114%
Generic External 250GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 128GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 23 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 25 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	179x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	104x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16