Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 114 2-Core 210 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 476 52% 414 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.15% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 7.44 6% 8.91 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 15 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.15% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2871302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 102 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 371 Write 102 Mixed 137 SusWrite 99.9 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 11.8 46% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 117 100% 150 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 809GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 133 135 134 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 98 Write 107 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 131 72% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 180% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.6% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 22.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16