Biostar TPOWER X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TPOWER X79  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 01:27
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 173
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 503
49% 404 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 114
Parallax 108
84% 108 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 83.3
73% 89.6 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 112 106 108 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 149
SusWrite 105
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 20.4
70% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 116
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 40%
Great: 84%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
220GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1018 540 320 318 318 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,292
Write 1,098
Mixed 1,043
SusWrite 472
218% 976 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 56.4
184% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 470
342% 448 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 157%
Great: 280%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
930GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 215 214 212 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 162
Mixed 29
SusWrite 208
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.1
376% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 113%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
9GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 14 13 14 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 95.2
Write 38.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 14.7
49% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.8
163% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/ F3-2400C10-4G F3-2400C10-4G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TPOWER X79 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TPOWER X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback