Lenovo 0616A44

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 0616A44  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0616A44
Memory1.1 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 39.5
1-Core 20
2-Core 23.7
20% 27.7 Pts
4-Core 24.6
8-Core 31.2
4% 27.9 Pts
64-Core 43.1
3% 43.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 213A) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.34
1% 0.65 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 41 18 15 21 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 42
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 23.2
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback