Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 17:43
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 161
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 377
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 191
Parallax 174
146% 181 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 178
Splatting 125
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 447 547 560 566 553 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 570
Mixed 416
SusWrite 518
122% 543 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 54.6
188% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 744
545% 713 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 148%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
50GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 274 279 278 279 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 293
Mixed 394
SusWrite 284
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 51.8
181% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 235
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
555GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 141
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 135
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
7GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 4 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.4
7% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $913
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback