Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus Zephyrus M GM501GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GM501GM
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '19 at 13:57
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.7% Below average	Memory 44.8 1-Core 25.4 2-Core 50.4 26% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 167 16% 134 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 184E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.5% Poor	Lighting 27.3 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 26.8 22% 31.1 fps	MRender 8.38 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 54 32% 36.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1133 1187 1160 1236 1196 1107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 695 Write 700 Mixed 404 SusWrite 1170 168% 742 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 29.2 98% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 233 172% 226 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 292%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 865GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 100 102 97 99 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 49 Write 97.3 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 99 55% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 56GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 8.7 8.8 9.1 9.8 9.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 8 9% 8.05 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.5 141% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 33,430 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	59x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	30x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	62x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	5x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	2x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	58x
CT16G4SFRA266.M16FR Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 32GBUnknownBench 77%, 9 samples	5x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16