Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6800K-$331
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
1-Core 104
2-Core 224
76% 164 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 779
76% 609 Pts
64-Core 939
63% 939 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 117
Reflection 106
Parallax 113
30% 112 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 116
Splatting 79.3
29% 89.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 640 603 581 571 582 624 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,196
Write 715
Mixed 804
SusWrite 600
237% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 78.4
298% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 990
761% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 263%
Great: 356%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$330
577GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 478 472 462 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 408
Mixed 409
SusWrite 473
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 57.5
189% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 302
228% 304 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 121%
Great: 135%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$125
335GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 479 481 481 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 477
Mixed 458
SusWrite 481
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.5
188% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 298
224% 299 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
937GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 115
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 44.5
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 23.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 127%
Great: 121%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 3,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback