Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '19 at 01:03
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 140
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 462
43% 360 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 138
Parallax 129
104% 132 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 123
Splatting 104
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 191 146 160 179 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 297
Write 245
Mixed 223
SusWrite 174
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 28.2
100% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 156
136% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 81 59 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 50
Write 60
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 74.4
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 85%
EZ USB 3.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 52.8
Write 11
Mixed 4.2
20% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 12%
Staples Relay UFD 8GB
7GB free, PID 5202
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 12
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 3.7
13% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL8-4GBXM F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback