PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
Memory | 29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150323 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 06 '19 at 13:34 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 281 287 288 290 285 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
214GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 270 272 273 273 269 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
2.09%
Terrible
|
||||
USB2.0 CardReader SD 32GB
29GB free, PID 6230
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.8 MB/s
|
4.29%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 441x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 215x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $630 |