| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision T1650 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T1650 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 05 '19 at 20:26 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.5%
Very good
|
72% 125 Pts
|
50% 370 Pts
|
23% 372 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 053A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
|
4.23%
Terrible
|
4% 4.65 fps
|
5% 5.91 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 55 39 50 57 56 MB/s
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
22% 29.9 MB/s
|
59% 0.43 MB/s
| |
|
|
36.1%
Below average
|
43% 58.5 MB/s
|
158% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.6%
Above average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
56% 72.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 947 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 307x |
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 147x |
| Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 81x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 73x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |