Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 55.4 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 102 39% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 357 34% 281 Pts	64-Core 1270 79% 1270 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 19.1 13% 16.3 fps	MRender 21 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 16.9 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 292GB free (System drive) Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 435 440 413 361 367 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 421 Mixed 415 SusWrite 409 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 36.3 126% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 292 238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 125%
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80 7,190 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 111GB free Firmware: 021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 437 433 188 86 87 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 437 Write 406 Mixed 406 SusWrite 278 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 37.5 124% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 41.4 103% 215 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 115%
Samsung HD083GJ 80GB 617 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 149GB free Firmware: 1117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 151 151 151 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 150 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 8x8GB 223 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 32.9 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16