PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
Memory | 59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 04 '19 at 19:26 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 435 440 413 361 367 MB/s
|
98.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: 021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 437 433 188 86 87 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung HD083GJ 80GB
149GB free
Firmware: 1117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 151 151 151 151 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
84.9%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 145x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 113x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |