Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 52.3 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 106 42% 70.5 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 500 45% 381 Pts	64-Core 1,283 79% 1,283 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 412.16 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 19.6 12% 16.4 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 17 15% 19 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 429 432 403 354 357 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 434 Write 404 Mixed 404 SusWrite 403 93% 411 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 44.1 139% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 291 238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80 7,190 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 111GB free Firmware: 021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 427 426 237 84 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 405 Mixed 400 SusWrite 281 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 45.5 144% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 105 132% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 115%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 4GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID a788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.7 5.4 5.3 5.1 5.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.1 8% 7.75 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 8x8GB 223 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 40.1 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 31.7 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.5 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16