Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '19 at 03:03
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 150
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 387
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (73 fps cap detected)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 63.6
60% 69.9 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 72.8
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 127 228 229 228 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 231
Write 145
Mixed 222
SusWrite 197
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 28.9
92% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 45.1
76% 148 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
779GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 81 129 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 121
Write 111
Mixed 93
SusWrite 118
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
759GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 81 124 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 115
Write 90.6
Mixed 68
SusWrite 114
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $301
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback