Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision T7600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T7600 (all builds)
Memory	55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170506
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '19 at 00:12
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0 674 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 160 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 532 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 1,278 79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C300) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.1% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 127 Parallax 114 97% 120 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 121 Splatting 100 86% 105 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB 10,504 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 775GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 402 410 411 412 412 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 409 Write 405 Mixed 299 SusWrite 406 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 25.5 85% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 190 153% 215 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 378GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 315 316 317 316 317 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 445 Write 422 Mixed 417 SusWrite 328 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 27.7 97% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 235 176% 233 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 118%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 119GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 168 172 169 169 169 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.5% Average	Read 268 Write 171 Mixed 195 SusWrite 170 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 16.7 54% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 79.4 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 83 61% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 552GB free Firmware: 1A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 153 154 155 155 155 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 150 Write 151 Mixed 106 SusWrite 153 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 109%
Seagate ST9900805SS 900GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 471GB free Firmware: CS05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 53 53 53 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 139 Write 51.8 Mixed 61 SusWrite 52.3 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 730GB free Firmware: 8136 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 28.2 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 9.3 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 8136 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 29.2 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 9.3 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 768GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 31 Write 25 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 15.9 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 8x8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 28.6 97% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.4 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	92x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	76x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	75x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	33x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16